Nortel Buzzboard Categories
  About Nortel Buzzboard



 Blog Roll
Nortel Buzzboard
< Previous | Next >

Today's Wall Street Journal story on Nortel
By Bo Gowan, Dec 10, 2008, 02:02 PM EST


This morning the Wall Street Journal published an article that Nortel "has sought legal counsel to explore bankruptcy-court protection from creditors in the event that its restructuring plan fails, according to people familiar with the situation." This WSJ story has filtered through to various other publications as well.

 

To be clear, Nortel's Ronald Alepian expressed to the WSJ that no bankruptcy filing is imminent.

 

Just a few weeks ago, Standard & Poor's released a report reaffirming our credit rating, and stating that "The affirmation primarily reflects our view that Nortel should be able to sustain adequate levels of liquidity in the next 12-18 months to support its high fixed charges and turnaround efforts despite difficult market conditions and company-specific challenges."

In addition, National Bank Financial analyst Kris Thompson issued a research note today saying that Companies' Creditor Arrangement Act (CCAA) protection is premature at this point. "With no short-term debt obligations and the possibility that Nortel can successfully restructure, we would not expect CCAA as a near-term consideration by the company," he said in the research note.

 

Nortel has no debt maturity until 2011, and we are working to preserve our cash position. On November 10th, Nortel put in place an aggressive plan to bring down costs by $400 million in 2009 alone.

 

The goals we laid out on November 10th have not changed. We remain focused on executing a significant shift to our operating model and cost base to reflect the economic environment that we are now in.


Tags: corporate-executives, industry-news, wsj, nortel-news

Bookmark:         




Trackbacks - incoming links to this blog post.
Dec 10, 2008 2:26 PM Guest Nortel Seeks Bankruptcy Advice | All About Nortel

[...] GigaOm has a statement from a Nortel spokeswoman. Nortel&#8217;s Bo Gowan has a post on Buzzboard about the WSJ story and Nortel&#8217;s strategic [...]

Dec 10, 2008 2:27 PM Guest The End of the Line? | All About Nortel

[...] Nortel&#8217;s Bo Gowan has a post on Buzzboard about the WSJ story and Nortel&#8217;s strategic [...]

Dec 11, 2008 9:40 AM Guest Un Espana en Silicon Valley &raquo; Multimillonarios con blog

[...] tirando a gris como Nortel, al otro lado de la frontera, utiliza los blogs de sus directivos para salir al paso de lo que puedan decir o no los medios de [...]

Comments:

Click to view guest's profile
     

@FD - unfortunately I just discovered that WordPress doesn’t automatically account for daylight savings time changes. I just updated the settings, so the times of posts and comments should be accurate now.

 

-Bo Gowan



Dec 10, 2008 2:03 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Bo, are you able to confirm or deny “has sought legal counsel to explore bankruptcy-court protection from creditors in the event that its restructuring plan fails, according to people familiar with the situation.”?

 

-sam



Dec 10, 2008 2:16 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Published in The Mysterious Future

 

-FD



Dec 10, 2008 2:19 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Oh nevermind, just a daylight savings hiccup (posted at 1:20 EST)

 

-FD



Dec 10, 2008 2:20 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Bo,

 

Thanks for the info, but I guess it’s true that someone from Nortel sought legal counsel to explore bankruptcy protection? If this is not the case, why was Ronald Alepian at all expressing his opinion to WSJ? Nortel created a negative hype around itself and all statements will be interpreted negatively if not carefully thought out. Again: ask managers to keep quiet until statements are checked and verified...you are not in control of your external relations! This is just another example of poor communication that turns bad things worse.

 

Get some positive numbers behind your turnaround plans and communicate them precisely and in a positive controlled way...it’s the only way to shift the sentiment.

 

-Torben



Dec 10, 2008 2:33 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

PS: Get this correction placed in WSJ immediately and ensure that it’s being spread to other media as well - you need to be very aggressive in this!!!

 

-Torben



Dec 10, 2008 2:39 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

This is a classic market surviellance case that will probably go unanswered. Undisclosed reports of portending filing for bankruptcy when the 2011 debt is not current and won’t be current until 2010. A company that spins feel good news while allowing its "spokesperson" to destroy its shareholders with unclear disclosures to the business press? So what if the company discussed reorganization using legal means available? The issue is that the "spokesperson" should be reassigned from investor relations ASAP. All those smart engineers and leading products mean nothing if you don’t communicate effectively to customers and investors.

 

-Robert Aceti



Dec 10, 2008 3:06 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Robert, I completely agree with you and am of opinion that the person guilty for this miscommunication should be dismissed with no warning - he will never be able to make up the losses caused. This would also send a clear message to other naive Nortel employees not able to resist the temptation of getting their names printed in the press. Furthermore the top management should see this as yet another indication that information needs to be controlled with far tighter control - something some of us have warned them about several times in the past!! Problem is that customers are becoming still more wary of dealing with Nortel due to the uncertain long-term perspective.

 

-Torben



Dec 10, 2008 3:18 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Did NT disclose any consultations with professional advisers to assess bankruptcy filings to the business press before disclosing it as a material event? All this matters less if the 4Q08 comes in as predicted. Operational realignment along business lines should offer better internal control and tactical management response - i.e. sales closing negotiations and arrangements - to business conditions. The test will be whether business leaders are able to turn their respective divisions around in time to turn the company cash-flow positive by 2011 when the July debt is due for refinance.

 

-Robert Aceti



Dec 10, 2008 3:31 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Torben and Robert - let’s not kill the messenger here. The spokesperson in the WSJ (Ronald Alepian) is our corporate VP of communications. The WSJ came to Nortel with this story, not the other way around.

 

"getting their names printed in the press" was the furthest thing from Ronald’s mind when talking to WSJ.

 

To be clear, he is not the person who provided the information WSJ referred to as "people familiar with the situation." I have no idea who WSJ’s sources are.

 

Ronald’s statements were clear: "no bankruptcy filing is imminent."

 

-Bo Gowan



Dec 10, 2008 3:36 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Bo, I did not specifically mention Mr. Alepian’s name as the person to reallocate from Investor relations. The issue remains, did WSJ mis-state the facts or did someone from within NT disclosure inside information not previously disclosure by the corporation. Clearly, the company is not a start-up and should have this matter resolved today to avoid future mis-statements that lead to unintended results. Focus on meeting 4Q08 guidance and let’s resolve this matter today. The WSJ is professionally obligated to report its source(s) of disclosures to market regulators as it clearly had a material impact on NT share prices. The stock market may be the greatest game on earth but it still has rules.

 

-Robert Aceti



Dec 10, 2008 4:02 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Bo, I’m definitely not on a "witch-hunt" here although I’m aware that my statements are very direct and point to drastic measures. I’m not aware who leaked the information to WSJ and this is why I didn’t mention Ronald’s name in my latest post. I’ve now several times recommended that Nortel once and for all close these evident leaks - a "no communication" policy...Ronald makes the talking!" You need to find the responsible person and dismiss him if you want to prevent these situations in the future. BTW...I don’t think Ronald’s statement was so clear unless he said "we have not sought legal bankruptcy advice and we are confident it won’t be needed"! I sense that the root-problem here is that you actually DID seek legal advice and now your problem is to communicate that it doesn’t mean that you feel threatened on your future!? ...if your cash-position is good until 2011 and it’s premature to file for bankruptcy, I guess it’s also premature to seek for advice? Nobody will invest in a company fearing that it will be bankrupt in 1-2 years...so it really doesn’t matter if you think you will need protection now or in 2 years!

 

-Torben



Dec 10, 2008 4:09 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

WHERE IS THIS COMPANY’S LEADERSHIP? DOES THIS COMPANY HAVE ANY LEADERS?

 

WHERE IS MIKE ZAFIROVSKI?

 

Pavi Binning was originally scheduled to be a presenter at an analyst conference on November 18, but the presentation was cancelled.

 

George Riedel was scheduled to be a presenter at a conference on December 3, but he was replaced.

 

With all of the adverse publicity today, WHERE ARE NORTEL’S SENIOR LEADERS?

 

Where is Nortel’s strategic plan to grow?

 

-LARRY



Dec 10, 2008 4:12 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Bo,

 

Do you have any comments on the bloomberg story "Nortel Gets Advice on Strategy From Lazard, Cleary, People Say"

 

If it is Nortel’s strategy to drive the stock and bond price to nothing to restructure debt, congratulations, job well done. But you are chasing off your invertors, supporters and customers.

 

-sam



Dec 10, 2008 4:13 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Dec 10, 2008 4:16 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Torben

 

I agree with the last part of your post,if Nortel’s spokesperson says

 

"A Nortel spokesman told Reuters "no bankruptcy filing is imminent," but added the company has engaged advisers to help it plot out its future. He declined to say whether any of those advisers were bankruptcy experts."

 

With that statement being said by a Nortel spokesman,this only intensifies the fear that Nortel’s financial situation could be worse than what most believe.If Nortel has taken steps to cut $400 million from their cost structure along with enough liquidity to maintain operations over the next 12-18 months even in these tougher economic times,according to S&P’s latest comments,so then why even bother making this an issue?

 

As Torben has noted the Nortel insider who accommodated the WSJ article has acted irresponsible considering the fact that Nortel has sufficient liquidity for at least the next twelve months,that is unless something else is going on.

 

Either way this points to a lack of internal control especially considering the subject matter.

 

-Bill Stock



Dec 10, 2008 4:37 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

It seems that NT’s most successful business is to attract class action suits. Last evening and this morning we have possible mis-statements from WSJ and related newswires possibly taken out of context and now we have Bloomberg chiming in after hours with a more robust statement that includes the names of the professionals vetted to advise on "bankruptcy".

 

-Robert Aceti



Dec 10, 2008 4:38 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Bo, if Ronald is VP of Communication, it’s maybe about time for him to actually take control of the communication? You guys are too proud to listen and instead keep defending every move you make...all the way down to rock bottom. I’ve warned you several times that miscommunication will happen if you don’t control matters...now we are all paying the price!

 

-Torben



Dec 10, 2008 4:45 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

i think that binning or Z better surface and straighten this thing out..SOON!

 

-bay



Dec 10, 2008 5:24 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

We should be prepared for something bad tomorrow or Friday, something is very rotten here.

 

Read the Nortel news on Bloomberg. Regardless what the VP of Communications is stating, forget about Bo. Mike Z, Pavi Binning, George Riedel, these guys are in hiding. Forget about what Nortel’s people are stating here on the blog boards, etc.

 

THIS IS SCARY! I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT MIKE Z. IS GOING TO PULL THE PLUG ON SHAREHOLDERS. (MY OWN PERSONAL OPINION).

 

GOOD LUCK TO EVERYONE HERE!

 

-LARRY



Dec 10, 2008 5:46 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Larry, if that will be the case, I believe we have a good case suing Nortel for giving misleading information here on the blog. I’m of opinion that the situation might be somehow better than it appears from the press and that Nortel allows this perception to prevail as the top management understands absolutely nothing about communication. I’m also of opinion that Mike Z must be replaced and a far more firm leadership instated - I got a gut-feeling that e.g. Alcatel-Lucent is on right track with the new CEO in place...at least the clouds surrounding them seem to have lifted a bit. BR, Torben

 

-Torben



Dec 10, 2008 6:11 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

It is very sad to see that Nortel is beyond saving. Nortel has lost contact with there customer base with the sheer stupidity of things like SRS and PASS.

 

End users are scared to buy Nortel products and partners are dropping like flies. What a sad state to see such great products fall by the wayside due to such poor management and total ignorance of marketplace. The best thing Nortel could do is sell to a company like Cisco, Lucent or even Nokia. Bye bye Nortel.

 

-Concerned Partner



Dec 10, 2008 6:19 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Torben, there was a Mike Quigley who was thought to be a replacement for Pat Russo. He had spent several years with Alcatel. Mike Z. has been a poor choice of Nortel’s board of directors, and he needs to be removed. If anyone has wondered why he was passed over by Motorola’s board, one merely needs to look at Nortel.

 

In any event, I think that it is too late. Again, my opinion, Mike Z. is going to pull the plug. I cannot prove it, I cannot confirm it, it’s just that there is too much out there in the press that the big B is coming soon. Mike Z. will use the excuse that it is the only way for the company to survive for the long-term.

 

-LARRY



Dec 10, 2008 6:30 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Larry, I agree that Mike Q might be a good choice. In any case I believe that the best thing Mike Z could do for Nortel, is to leave and forfeit any kind of bonus or severance payment. If nothing else, his departure might bring new hope and optimism about Nortel’s chances of survival. At least we are not gonna miss him on the blog as he has never bothered to talk to us "ordinary investors". BR, Torben

 

-Torben



Dec 10, 2008 6:58 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Folks could compare Nortel’s running a bankruptcy scenario to taking out a life insurance policy and/or getting one’s finances in order in the wake of, say, a shadow discovered on the routine CAT scan of a lung.

 

Perfectly healthy, sane people (should) always plan ahead, with the understanding that lighting can and will strike most anywhere.

 

So why sit around and wait for the biopsy results, then perhaps seek out second, third, and fourth opinions until a single one is found that sounds most convenient and promising?

 

Folks could argue that - unlike its competitors - Nortel, in these for everyone troubling times, is actually taking the soberest, pro-active, forward-looking stance in the interest of its future - employees, shareholders, customers.

 

-huh



Dec 10, 2008 9:34 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

I don��t believe Mike Z. is going to push for BK since all employment contracts including Mike��s will likely become void to the extent that severance agreements are no longer binding on the Company.

 

Consequently, Mike Z. will not want to shoot himself in the foot and will likely delay bankruptcy for as long as possible.

 

-Nortel watcher



Dec 10, 2008 11:10 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Some wallstreet crooks want Nortel to have sufficient cash for CY 2012 and beyond while they don’t have sufficient cash for their very own next-month operation. Did they bu11*** on Lehman’s cash position in August 2008?

 

-Tom



Dec 10, 2008 11:11 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Further, any toxic assets in Nortel’s book (as Lehman/Bear did)? is Nortel’s debt bigger than Citi? customer satisfaction for Nortel’s switches/base—stations is lower than GM’s Pontiac/Dodge/Chevy?

 

#### those wall street crooks.

 

-Tom



Dec 10, 2008 11:16 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Nortel is not a bank regulated by FDIC/OTS. i don’t see any possibility that the US government agencies can help Cisco steal Nortel as they helped JPMorgan steal Washington Mutual: Wall Street rumors brought bank run to WaMu, how can Wall Street rumors convince the owners of those thounsands of Nortel switches and base stations to shut them down?

 

Without Wall Street crooks, both America and Canada can be much better off.

 

-Tom



Dec 10, 2008 11:33 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

A complete disaster happens every time the Nortel Spokesmen open their mouth... why do you have to communicate in a way that shatters investors’ confidence?

 

why is every time when there is a press release related to financial positions, the market misinterprets some info?????

 

-mave



Dec 11, 2008 12:23 AM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Mave,

 

That’s exactly the key question. Personally I’m not criticizing the fact that Nortel sought bankruptcy protection advice. The key problem remains the way they communicate and something serious should be done about it - I’ve been warning about it for months now. This latest misinterpreted misinformed leak from Nortel has very negative consequences and I’m highly surprised that Mike Z is not standing up to rectify the situation in order to prevent more customers from running screaming away. Unfortunately this has become a pattern...a lot of talk but nobody seems to be walking the talk!?

 

BR, Torben

 

-Torben



Dec 11, 2008 4:52 AM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Lots of comments, discussion and questions raised here, let me try to address some of them.

 

@Robert - To your comment that "The WSJ is professionally obligated to report its source(s) of disclosures to market regulators as it clearly had a material impact on NT share prices." I don’t know if that’s true, but even if it is that doesn’t mean those sources will be public, right? It is common practice today for media to use unnamed sources for stories, as the WSJ did with this story. We don’t know who the "people familiar with the situation" are that WSJ uses as a source, and I don’t think WSJ has any intention of disclosing them. I see several comments assuming this is an internal Nortel "leak" and I don’t think you can draw that conclusion from the info WSJ provided.

 

@sam and your question on the Bloomberg story. There are now multiple stories speculating on what firms are advising Nortel and what they are talking about. Like most big companies, we have a range of 3rd party advisors. But I can’t comment on who they are, or provide any more detail than Ronald did about our discussions. But as we’ve stated elsewhere, our plans as outlined on November 10 remain in place.

 

To comments about Nortel’s comms strategy or activities around this and other news. I know this news is not what we want at the top of the WSJ. But realize that we cannot control the dialogue about Nortel -- whether it���s via professional reporters with many different sources, analysts who are predicting the future, customers who are looking for the best products, etc. We can push out our messages, and respond to other opinions from industry voices (as Ronald did directly to the WSJ) but in the end they have their own voice. The web 2.0 social media world that lets you all give me and Nortel direct feedback on this blog is the same environment that enables these other industry voices to more freely spread their opinion.

 

-Bo Gowan



Dec 11, 2008 12:54 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Bo,

 

Yes you can control at least some of the dialogue. The following concerns today’s email to investor relations this morning. I have sent many to investor relations!

 

Yesterday, Samih Elhage presented at the Barclay’s Global Technology Conference. During his presentation, Samih Elhage stated that there has been "significant progress toward the transformation plan." I believe that the quote is correct. In any event, his statement is not believable and, more importantly, the statement is not credible! With a backdrop of the issues in the 12/10/08 Wall Street Journal article and a stock price that is under $0.50 how could you expect anyone to believe that there has been "significant progress toward the transformation plan?"

 

You people must think that investors are stupid! If Nortel personnel will not make credible and believable statements, then Nortel personnel should be heard and should not be seen.

 

Additionally, at the outset of yesterday’s presentation, the host stated that questions concerning the Wall Street Journal article would be restricted to the breakout session. Did Samih Elhage keep his mouth shut, or did he make statements that the entire investment world should have heard?

 

Also, the host sarcastically made a reference, directed at Samih Elhage, that he knew some bankruptcy attorneys if they were in fact were needed.

 

I have sent you people many emails thus far, and I am certain that you have no use for me, but *****

 

-LARRY



Dec 11, 2008 1:19 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Bo, if you could only control information from your own employees, I feel certain that you would have reached far! BR, Torben

 

-Torben



Dec 11, 2008 1:20 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Nortel spokespersons did nothing wrong on this "seeking legal advice" issue, and i agree with Bo Gowan that Nortel cannot install its mouth onto TelNor’s head. However, it’s Nortel’s obligation to tell TelNor that "you TelNor cannot install your mouth on my Nortel head, either". actually that’s the traditional/classic dirty/nasty trick those Wall Street crooks played with everybody: "Mike went to the AutoBodyShop yesterday, so Mike must get an auto accident unless he proves the otherwise". back to reality: size does matter---if Nortel controls some big mouthpiece, Nortel can shoot those crooks back with the exact same bullet: "before you worry about my 2011 debt obligation, please mind your very own business by taking good care of your very own next-week debt obligation". so the issue is what can be done while Nortel doesn’t have that sort of media power? the answer is "grassroot". i am not a Nortel employee but i urge all NT associates/affiliates to do some abc/123 type of work.

 

-Tom



Dec 11, 2008 1:46 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Hey folks - I understand the passion and I want you to express it, but let’s please abstain from using profanity or from posting derogatory comments to specific individuals.

 

-Bo Gowan



Dec 11, 2008 2:17 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

It’s not about "passion". here are the lists:

 

1. RIMM had been the greatest on earth for 4+ years because they had a big chunk of it;

 

2. China’s BIDU had been the greatest on earth for 3+ years for the same reason;

 

3. Steve Jobs’ Walkman (they renamed it as "pOd") had been the greatest mankind invention in human history for the obvious reason;

 

4. Sun/Java’s McNeally is worst on earth;

 

5. Motorola’s Zander (Sun Alumni) is the worst on earth;

 

6. Nortel’s Mike Z (Motorola alumni) is the worst on earth;

 

7. HP’s Ms F is the worst on earth;

 

8. China was the greatest and finest country on earth when they were long on the Chinese securities;

 

the list goes on and on: wake up, people. it’s not about "passion". It’s about methodolgy---->those crooks can be fixed if you and i work together and start to do the grassroot work today.

 

-Tom



Dec 11, 2008 3:28 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Alcatel will be presenting it’s strategic plan tomorrow 12/12/08, Friday. Replays will be available, view the investors area of the Alcatel web-site.

 

Perhaps some insight will be gained relative to Nortel.

 

-LARRY



Dec 11, 2008 4:04 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

I continue to believe that tomorrow will be some type of day of reckoning for Nortel (see #20 above). I cannot prove it, I cannot confirm anything.

 

Senior Nortel individuals (Z, Binning, Riedel) have been noticeable missing from recent news events. These people cannot let this uncertainty continue, it is insulting and it is offensive. Regardless of what may take place, something must be stated by senior Nortel personnel (not the vp of communications, not investor relations, not some lower lever Nortel subordinate at an analyst conference).

 

-LARRY



Dec 11, 2008 5:39 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Ron telling WSJ that "no bankruptcy filing is imminent" would, in common North American English, usually be interpreted as "bankruptcy is on our minds, but not happening yet". It baffles me that Nortel can’t see this simple communications ambiguity problem. It would have been better for Ron to say nothing at all, than to use the words "is imminent".

 

Every single quarterly and annual earnings report seems to bring yet another regrettable foot-in-mouth sound bite that the analysts have a field day on. Nortel needs to hire a highly articulate spokesperson, and SOON!

 

-Ed



Dec 11, 2008 5:59 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

The superiority of products from Cisco and other providers has certainly been a thorn in the side of rival Nortel Networks. Indeed, Cisco’s competitor is now on the verge of going bust. On Wednesday, Nortel said it had appointed advisers to look at strategic options for the group, including bankruptcy.

 

Cisco is in an ideal position to exploit Nortel’s woes and grab market share here too.

 

-Bill Stock



Dec 11, 2008 7:17 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

free reminder: today is yesterday’s tomorrow; Monday will be today’s next trading day.

 

-Tom



Dec 12, 2008 1:41 PM by guest


Click to view guest's profile
     

Nortel’s business must be suffering terribly as rumors

 

 

about bankruptcy scare its customers. In my opinion, two

 

 

things must happen as soon as possible. First, Nortel must

 

 

announce a huge new contract from Verizon, Bell Canada, or

 

 

the Canadian government. Second, a debt swap must be

 

 

arranged where debt holders the face of their debt by at

 

 

least 50 cents on the dollar in exchange for new common

 

 

shares. Otherwise, bankruptcy will become a self-fulfilling

 

 

prophecy.

 

-alan



Dec 13, 2008 12:02 PM by guest


Click to view Larry's profile
     

WHERE IS MIKE ZAFIROVSKI? WHEN IS HE GOING TO COME FORWARD!

 

How did the Globe and Mail have so much detailed information about Nortel asset sales?

 

TELECOM

Bidders on hold as Nortel weighs options

Ponder offers of $1-billion for Ethernet unit

SIMON AVERY

TELECOM REPORTER

DECEMBER 23, 2008

Nortel Networks Corp. has received offers worth close to $1-billion (U.S.) for one of its divisions, but

continues to weigh alternatives before making a deal.

The company is still trying to determine whether its best route to profitability would be to sell more than

its Metro Ethernet unit, which officially went on the block in September.

The three offers on the table for the Metro Ethernet division are close to analysts' earlier estimates of up

to $1-billion, The Globe and Mail has learned. The unit accounted for 13 per cent of Nortel's $7.7-billion

in sales in the first nine months of the year.

Analysts have feared that the longer Nortel takes to sell the unit, the less money it will reap in a rapidly

deteriorating market. Maryland-based rival Ciena Corp. for example, saw its shares fall 20 per cent this

month after announcing disappointing results and guidance. But the three offers appear to have locked in

a price for the moment.

 

Three other companies have expressed an interest in buying all of Nortel, but none has floated a price yet,

and valuations for the entire company appear more volatile than for the Ethernet unit alone.

Nortel executives have been criticized in the past for acting too slowly. Their hesitancy today relates to

finding the best way to raise cash as the company struggles to cut costs and stem falling sales in time to

manage its next round of debt financing in 2011.

In addition to selling the Ethernet unit, which includes Nortel's cutting-edge optical Ethernet products, the

company is considering selling its carrier networks division, which sells gear to phone companies, and

even its enterprise division that sells to businesses.

Management has had discussions with both the Department of Finance and Industry Canada about

throwing a lifeline to the company but Ottawa has not made a decision. "It would be inappropriate for the

Government of Canada to comment," said a spokeswoman for Industry Canada.

Executives have also tried to smooth the way in both Ottawa and Washington for any offer coming from

China's Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., which would like to buy the entire company. Both governments

have concerns about putting contracts for their communications in Chinese hands. Early this year, the

U.S. blocked Huawei's attempt to purchase 16.5 per cent of network equipment maker 3Com Corp.

through a partnership with Boston-based Bain Capital Partners.

Nortel's chief executive officer, Mike Zafirovski, is a member of U.S. President George Bush's National

Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee, which complicates any relationship with Huawei.

Ottawa could choose to help Nortel in more ways than just a bailout. One option, not yet discussed,

involves letting the company borrow against past research and development tax credits that Nortel has not

been able to claim without profitability.

Nortel has consistently spent more on research and development than any other Canadian company. In

2007, it spent about $1.85-billion, more than half-a-billion more than second-place BCE Inc., and more

than seven times the spend of Research In Motion Ltd.

The pool of banked R&D credits accumulated by companies across Canada poses an increasing liability

for the government because the Department of Finance doesn't know when and at what rate they will be

claimed. Letting companies like Nortel use the credits as collateral for government loans, in return for

reducing the pool, could benefit all parties, some experts say.

The companies most frequently said to have an interest in Nortel assets are: Nokia Siemens Networks,

Telefon AB LM Ericsson, Huawei and Cisco Systems Inc. Rivals Alcatel-Lucent and Motorola Inc. are

considered less likely bidders because they are struggling with their own problem

 



Dec 24, 2008 11:38 AM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

The following is an article from the Street.com, which adds to my previous posting. Further, the newer article contains speculation about a buyout of Nortel in total.

 

WHY IS NORTEL LAGGING IN THE PUBLIC RELATIONS CAMPAIGN?

 

 

Telecom Return to Article

Nortel Gets $1B Bids for Ethernet Biz: Report

 

James Rogers

12/24/08 - 12:25 PM EST

Beleaguered telecom equipment maker Nortel Networks(NT Quote - Cramer on NT - Stock Picks) has received offers worth close to $1 billion for the sale of some of its key assets, according to a news report in the Toronto Globe & Mail.

 

The Canadian firm, which has been wrestling with plummeting sales of its wireless gear, announced plans to divest its metro Ethernet networks business in September.

 

Telecom companies use Nortel's metro Ethernet products to deliver Internet services to consumers and businesses, and the sale aims to boost Nortel's flagging stock, which received a stern ultimatum this month: Boost share price or get booted from the NYSE.

 

In midday trading Wednesday, Nortel's stock slipped 2 cents, or 6.9%, to 27 cents, as the Nasdaq dipped 0.09%.

 

According to The Globe & Mail, Nortel has received three separate offers that are close to $1 billion, though the company declined to comment when contacted by TheStreet.com Wednesday.

 

One analyst thinks that any number of firms could be Nortel suitors.

 

"The most likely bidders for Nortel's assets are Ericsson, Huawei, Nokia Siemens, and Cisco Systems(CSCO Quote - Cramer on CSCO - Stock Picks)," wrote Avi Cohen, managing partner at analyst firm Avian Securities, in a note Tuesday. "We believe Alcatel-Lucent(ALU Quote - Cramer on ALU - Stock Picks) and Motorola(MOT Quote - Cramer on MOT - Stock Picks) are less likely bidders because they are struggling with their own challenges and would have a hard time financing such a purchase."

 

The Globe and Mail report claims that Nortel is also considering selling off more than its metro Ethernet unit. The company is mulling the sale of its carrier networks division and even its enterprise business, it said.

 

Cohen has heard that China's Huawei would like to bid on the entire company, although Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) regulations could prohibit this. The analyst adds that Ericsson would be the most likely suitor for Nortel's carrier business, as the acquisition would expand its reach in radio communication technologies.

 

In his note, Cohen explained that the telecom sector is changing rapidly, as exemplified by the Alcatel-Lucent, and Nokia(NOK Quote - Cramer on NOK - Stock Picks)-Siemens(SI Quote - Cramer on SI - Stock Picks) mergers. Telecom firms are also feeling the effects of the recession, he added.

 

"Over the next two years we expect conditions to remain very tough, both competitively and because of the current economic/financing malaise," he wrote. "Nortel's struggles and possible dissolution represent just another step in this rationalization in light of carrier consolidation and depressed CapEx spending.

 

Nortel, which competes with Cisco and Motorola, posted a $3.4 billion loss in its recent third-quarter results. Revenue fell 14% to $2.32 billion, and the company said it plans to cut 1,300 jobs in an attempt to boost its business.

 

 

 



Dec 24, 2008 2:51 PM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

It was well known that during the Admiral Owens control of Nortel, the company took it's focus away from the business and lost customers/business. It is obvious that under Nortel's current uncertainties, the company continues to lose customers. From Networkworld-

 

Juniper poaching Nortel's channels?

 

Investment firm says Juniper’s switching business has much to gain

By Jim Duffy , Network World , 12/29/2008

Sponsored by:

 

Juniper has the most to gain from Nortel's tenuous financial position, according to a bulletin issued this month by investment firm Oppenheimer & Co.

 

Juniper is aggressively recruiting Nortel's channel partners as Nortel grapples with a decision on whether to file for bankruptcy as it readies some of its assets for sale. Nortel has reportedly received bids for its Metro Ethernet Networks business, which the company put on the block in September, and may be looking to sell off more businesses.

 

"We believe recent reports that Nortel is contemplating bankruptcy are likely to force its enterprise channel to look for new alternatives," states Oppenheimer analyst Ittai Kidron in the report, which was issued last week. "With roughly $600M-$700M in quarterly enterprise revenue, we believe Nortel's enterprise business could deteriorate faster than its carrier business. We expect competitors to aggressively poach Nortel's channels and enterprise business."

 

Oppenheimer believes Juniper has already taken "aggressive steps" targeting Nortel's channels and is the one competitor -- Cisco and F5 Networks being others -- that could see the most meaningful upside relative to its market position.

 

Related Content

Juniper was not immediately available for comment.

 

Juniper's overlap with Nortel is primarily in switching, routing and security, Oppenheimer notes. Juniper's switching business should get a "solid boost" at Nortel's expense from the ability to attract the beleaguered company's channel partners, the firm asserts.

 

"We calculate that just a 6% slice of the addressable enterprise business from Nortel -- $754 million in annual revenue -- would represent 16% of our 2009 revenue growth forecast for Juniper," Kidron states in his report.

 

Virtually all of Nortel's enterprise businesses -- switching, routing, security and VoIP -- are "up for grabs," according to Oppenheimer. Nortel has seen its market share deteriorate over the past two to three years in these areas, although its still retains a "solid, credible position" in VoIP, the firm asserts.

 

For Cisco, the overall impact of Nortel's precarious position will be muted, Oppenheimer notes. A 6% share gain of Nortel's enterprise revenue could add $152 million to Cisco's fiscal 2009 sales of $38 billion, slightly improving Cisco's year-over-year growth to -3% vs. -4%, the firm states.

 

F5 may not benefit meaningfully from the fallout of Nortel's situation because Nortel hasn't been a serious competitor in the Layer 4 to Layer 7 market for years, according to Oppenheimer. F5 has already penetrated Nortel's customer base, limiting the positive impact, the firm notes.

 



Dec 29, 2008 2:17 PM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

While Mike Zafirovski and the rest of Nortel senior managers are behind closed doors keeping silent, the rest of the world knows more about Nortel-

 

Radware eyes Nortel unit

 

Plans to acquire Metro Ethernet Networks

 

By Aharon Etengoff in San Francisco @ Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:25 AM

 

 

Media reports indicate that Radware is poised to acquire Nortel's Metro Ethernet Networks unit for $30-50 million.

 

Despite the global economic recession, Radware has managed to retain $137.4 million in cash, which is comprised of both short and long-term investments.

 

Nortel currently maintains four business divisions, one of which competes against Radware, Cisco Systems and F5 Networks. The divisions include the Carrier Networks segment (wireline and wireless networks), Solutions (enterprise communications), Metro Ethernet Networks (carrier ethernet switching and multi-service switching) and Global Services, which provides network implementation services.

 

The Canada-based firm, which is currently experiencing a significant decline in wireless sales, recently announced plans to divest from its metro Ethernet networks business after posting a $3.4 billion loss for its third-quarter results. The sale, along with a series of layoffs, was apparently designed to bolster Nortel's plummeting stock value.

 

"Over the next two years we expect conditions to remain very tough, both competitively and because of the current economic/financing malaise," wrote Avi Cohen of Avian Securities in a statement quoted by the Toronto Globe and Mail.

 

Cohen had previously expected Ericsson, Huawei, Nokia Siemens and Cisco Systems to bid for Nortel's network unit. X

 



Jan 8, 2009 7:52 AM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

As I have stated in my earlier posting today, Mike Z. stays behind closed doors while more information appears in the press.

 

WHERE IS MIKE ZAFIROVSKI? ENOUGH OF HIS NONSENSE!

 

From the Globe and Mail-

 

Nortel bondholders seen preparing for the worst

ANDREW WILLIS, TODAY AT 9:34 AM EST

Post the first comment

Back to the blog

Nortel Network's lenders are said to be preparing for the worst, as a U.S. newswire reports that

bondholders have hired lawyers and are pushing for meetings with executives in the embattled tech

company.

Nortel bondholders have hired New York law firm Milbank Tweed and are asking for talks with Nortel

brass, according to Debtwire, a fixed-income news service run by the Financial Times. (Unfortunately, it's

a subscription-based site.) Such a move would be prudent, as numerous analysts have forecast Nortel

could be forced into creditor protection in the next 24 months. Milbank Tweed is a global firm with a

strong restructuring team - its lawyers are involved in the Lehmen Brothers bankruptcy.

The Debtwire report comes after last month's news that Nortel asked financial and legal advisers -

investment bank Lazard and law firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton - to consider creditor protection

as part of a larger restructuring of the company.

Nortel has declined to comment on its strategic options, though company executives do point out that

there is no immediate financing need, as no debts are due until 2011. Nortel's bonds trade for less than 20

cents on the dollar. Nortel is attempting to sell divisions in order to better focus operations at the former

high-flyer, but those divestiture plans are hampered by the weak prospects for the economy, and cuts in

tech hardware spending.

 

 



Jan 8, 2009 1:16 PM by Larry


Click to view Bo Gowan's profile
     

Hey Larry, I'm not going to comment on any specific article you've pointed to in the comments above, but generally I'd say that it's clear that the speculation in those articles is all over the map. As a company, we can't comment on every speculative story that gets posted. From a reader's perspective, many of these articles seem to have conflicting speculation, so how can you determine which (if any) are fact and which are fiction?

 

Obviously, the best way to know Nortel's intentions is from our execs. I understand the frustration with waiting for those details to be communicated, but I'm not sure trying to decipher all the media speculation is going to help.

 

 



Jan 9, 2009 12:35 AM by Bo Gowan


Click to view Larry's profile
     

The news articles and negative statements from analysts combined with the ongoing silence from Nortel execs is doing a great deal of damage.

 

Given the above, it seems that Nortel execs are building a huge whole from which it becomes more and more difficult to regain the confidence from the investment world.

 

As Nortel is currently under a time deadline to get the stock price to a level that will satisfy the requirements of the NYSE, I would not be surprise to see Nortel delay required filings. Nortel really has nothing to lose by delaying an filings.

 

 

 



Jan 9, 2009 1:29 PM by Larry


Click to view LF Burtschy's profile
     

LARRY is not Larry Burtschy. He may be glad of this as I own the stock! I have a good relationship with and alot of respect for NT management and employees. LARRY may make some valid points, but I want to disassociate myself from his comments on Mike Z and others at Nortel. Some NT employees in the Lenovo Lounge asked me if I was LARRY from the blog! I am not. From the beginning until now, I unconditionally back NT management. Well, I want whoever reads this t know that LARRY is not Larry Burtschy. Repeat, I want whoever reads this t know that LARRY is not Larry Burtschy



Jan 9, 2009 3:17 PM by LF Burtschy


Click to view Bo Gowan's profile
     

Hey Larry - thanks for clarifying I was aware of the two different Larry's, but I can see how there might have been some confusion. This actually raises a good point, I'm not sure that only having a first name signature scales well for this blog. There's bound to be more than one Mike, John, Frank and Bill wanting to comment on this blog.

 

I'll talk to our IT guys and see if we might be able to modify this format in the next release to add first and last name to the signature, or possibly use the screen name (registration asks you for one so not sure why we aren't using it).



Jan 9, 2009 3:49 PM by Bo Gowan


Click to view Larry's profile
     

In today's Wall Street Journal, there are statements from Nortel chairman Harry Pearce-

 

"Harry Pearce, chairman of Nortel Networks Corp. and a retired vice chairman of GM, also expects more CEO departures. "There's just enormous pressure" to replace CEOs amid the tough economic climate, Mr. Pearce said.

 

Mr. Pearce thinks many of these changes will be ill-advised. "It's probably the worst time to make a change," Mr. Pearce said. Hiring a fresh leader during crisis "almost invites bad decisions" because a newcomer must act fast before fully grasping the business, Mr. Pearce said. He declined to comment on the future of Nortel Chief Executive Mike Zafirovski, who has been running the troubled telecommunications equipment maker since 2005."

 

 

The following is a statement made by the previous chairman, L.R. Wilson about Frank Dunn, from a Business Week article dated June 10, 2002-

 

"It's not a time for a visionary," says Lynton R. (Red) Wilson, chairman of Nortel's board. "We thought that Frank was the guy with the right kind of skills."

 

We all know well what Frank Dunn brought to Nortel shareholders. Let us now look at what current chairman Harry Pearce stated about our current CEO/President in an October 17, 2005 press release-

 

"Mike Zafirovski has the kind of proven, team-building leadership that has seen him create significant new value during his career in two of the world's most important global corporations," said Harry J. Pearce, chairman of the board, Nortel. "He's the right leader to build on the important work of Bill Owens - and take Nortel to the next level."

 

Well, we all know well what level we have been taken.

 

For anyone here to say that they fully support current management, well, that kind of statement needs to questioned, to say the least!

 

 



Jan 13, 2009 2:12 PM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

NORTEL TO FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY! FROM THE GLOBE AND MAIL-

 

Nortel to file for bankruptcy protection

Facing $107-million interest on debts, former telecom giant will likely be broken up and sold to

foreign rivals

Article

Comments ( 38)

ANDREW WILLIS AND JACQUIE MCNISH AND MATTHEW HARTLEY

FROM WEDNESDAY'S GLOBE AND MAIL

JANUARY 14, 2009 AT 6:54 AM EST

Former technology titan Nortel Networks Corp. is expected to file for bankruptcy protection as early as

today, sources say, a move that will likely see what was once Canada's great corporate success story

broken up and sold to foreign rivals.

Nortel's board of directors was meeting last night to deal with a financial crisis, as the economic downturn

translates into a sharp drop in orders from phone company clients. The telecom-hardware manufacturer

failed to find buyers for a number of divisions that were put up for sale in September, and faces the

prospect of paying $107-million (U.S.) of interest on its debts tomorrow.

“It is an iconic Canadian name and there will be a great national grieving over this,” said one person

familiar with Nortel's plans.

The company's already crushed shares plunged further in European trading Wednesday as investors

absorbed the development, falling to as little as the equivalent of 35.41 cents Canadian on the Frankfurt

Stock Exchange, before inching back to 37.66 cents, down 2.9 cents from Tuesday's close.

Nortel Networks Corp.

Related Articles

Recent

Mike Z – Nortel's last, best CEO?

Nortel shares plunge ahead of debt payment

From the archives

Bidders on hold as Nortel weighs options

Nortel's shrinking playing field

Fending off bankruptcy, Nortel gears up asset sales

What's next for Nortel? More cost cuts won't be enough

According to sources working with Toronto-based Nortel and its creditors, the company plans to seek

court approval for creditor protection as early as this morning in Toronto and an undisclosed U.S.

location. Nortel executives had no comment yesterday on the company's plans.

Opting for creditor protection would mark an incredible fall from grace for a telecom manufacturer that is

almost as old as the telephone. Nortel easily qualified as the country's largest company at the peak of the

tech boom in 2000, with a $366-billion (Canadian) market capitalization and 95,000 employees.

While still North America's largest telecom equipment maker, Nortel's shares were worth a total of just

$192-million yesterday, and the company has 26,000 staff after a bruising series of layoffs over the past

eight years. Nortel stock that soared to $1,231 at the peak of the tech bubble – reflecting a recent

consolidation in shares – closed yesterday at 38.5 cents on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

Court protection from lenders, and the breakup that will likely follow, would mark the end of chief

executive officer Mike Zafirovski's four-year attempt to turn Nortel around. Mr. Zafirovski was

parachuted into the top job in 2005 after successful stints at General Electric and Motorola. But he was

never able to right a company plagued by a series of accounting scandals – one of his predecessors faces

fraud charges – and weakening demand for its products.

While not bankrupt – the company has an estimated $1-billion in its coffers – Nortel is burning though

cash at an impressive clip, and has $4.5-billion (U.S.) in long-term debt. Major lenders include JPMorgan

Chase, Citigroup and Royal Bank of Canada. Seeking court protection would give the company more

latitude in selling or restructuring factories and research facilities. Air Canada, for example, went this

route in 2003, continuing to fly while cutting jobs and reworking its debts. Duncan Stewart, an analyst at

DSAM Consulting in Toronto, said: “The issue is not whether or not they can pay it. … It's the idea of: If

you know you're eventually going to default anyway, why not do it now and keep the … interest

payments you would have shelled out?”

Typically, companies do not file for bankruptcy protection until they have drained most of their cash. But

the deepening global credit crunch had raised concerns that a troubled company such as Nortel would not

be able to raise enough money to finance its operations during bankruptcy proceedings.

The court filing will come as a shock to the company's bondholders, who had expected Nortel to pay its

debts this week. Shareholders will likely see their holdings all but wiped out.

As a consequence of filing for protection, Nortel can expect to lose significantly more business,

potentially sending the company into a death spiral, analysts say.

The sophisticated equipment made by Nortel carries an expectation from customers – the major phone

companies – that the manufacturer will be around to service networks. One of the reasons the auto makers

gave last month for resisting calls for them to file for bankruptcy protection was that potential customers

would not buy from a manufacturer they did not think would be around to service the vehicles. For the

network equipment industry, that fear is justifiably magnified.

When Nortel said in September that it would put its Metro Ethernet Networks division up for sale – it

makes hardware that carries Internet traffic – revenue fell on fears of sustainability and service.

Now Nortel faces the prospect of selling additional divisions to pay down debts, all under the supervision

of a judge. In addition to selling the Ethernet unit, divisions that could go on the auction block include the

carrier networks unit, which sells gear to phone companies, and the enterprise division that sells telecom

equipment to businesses. Potential buyers for these units are all foreign: Nokia Siemens Networks,

Telefon AB LM Ericsson, Cisco Systems Inc. and China's Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.

Nortel's storied history in the telecommunications field dates back nearly as far as the telephone itself.

The company was founded in 1895 as Northern Electric Manufacturing Company to begin selling

telephone equipment to other companies as Canada built out its first telecom network.

Throughout the first half of the 20th century, the company's telecom gear business grew steadily, but

Nortel also built telegraphic equipment used on the battlefields of the First World War as well as the first

sound system in Canada for talking movies.

In the 1950s, the company developed electromechanical switches, a technology that would allow direct

phone calls between cities. Nortel was an early pioneer of satellite technologies in the 1960s and helped

build Canada's first cellular telephone networks.

Nortel's fortunes exploded with the dawn of the Internet and the introduction of increasingly sophisticated

modems and cellular technologies. At its peak, this one company accounted for nearly one-third of the

total value of the TSX; the company was worth more than all six big banks combined.

Now the company is being brought to its knees by the prospect of paying $107-million of interest due to

its bondholders this week. However, that is not the only financial deadline facing Nortel. On Dec. 15, the

company was given a 30-day waiver from Export Development Canada on the government agency's

support for up to $750-million of credit. The deadline on that waiver is today.

With a report from Simon Avery

 

 



Jan 14, 2009 7:32 AM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

Bo,

 

The other Larry (Burtschy) made this statement: "From the beginning until now, I unconditionally back NT management. "

 

WHAT PRICE LOYALTY NOW LARRY BURTSCHY?

 

Well Bo, you might continue to have a job, but your stock will be worthless!



Jan 14, 2009 7:39 AM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

NORTEL HAS FILED FOR BANKRUPTCY-REUTERS-

 

Nortel files for bankruptcy protection in U.S.

Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:41am EST

TORONTO, Jan 14 (Reuters) - Nortel Networks Corp (NT.TO: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz)(NT.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz), North America's biggest maker of telephone equipment, filed for bankruptcy protection on Wednesday, a day before it was due to make an interest payment of about $107 million.

 

Nortel and a number of its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States, according to a court filing.

 

"Based on this filing, the board of directors must believe that not only is the fourth quarter bad, but that the first quarter is going to be just as bad or worse," said Duncan Stewart, an analyst at DSAM Consulting in Toronto.

 

"Although they have cash in the short term, even the medium-term outlook is not enough to make the company viable as a going concern."

 

Nortel's shares have tumbled along with the company's fortunes, sinking into penny-stock territory in recent months. In mid-2000, at the zenith of the company's success, they were worth more than C$1,100 each, adjusted for a stock consolidation that took place in late 2006.

 

RBC Capital Markets analyst Mark Sue had said previously that bankruptcy was a "distinct possibility" for Toronto-based Nortel and that it could collapse under its debt load before 2011.

 

Nortel has faced intense competition from North American and European rivals such as Alcatel-Lucent (ALU.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz), as well as low-cost Asian vendors such as Huawei Technologies HWT.UL.

 

The company has also suffered as telecom companies scale back spending on the equipment that Nortel makes.

 

The global economic slowdown has exacerbated Nortel's problems, leading it to warn last month that because of current conditions, its business is under pressure and its cash and liquidity are deteriorating.

 

In November, it reported a $3.4 billion quarterly loss, cut its 2008 outlook and announced 1,300 layoffs, or about 5 percent of its staff.

 

It also said it would freeze salary increases, cut back on consultants and review its real estate portfolio. ($1=$1.22 Canadian) (Reporting by Wojtek Dabrowski; editing by Frank McGurty)

 



Jan 14, 2009 8:47 AM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

Bo, with all due respect, there is no way anyone should have any believability in Mike Zafirovski any more. How could anyone expect him to any credibility in the investment world. On the other hand, he no longer has to worry about investment analysts or disgruntled shareholders. Every existing employee who now has worthless stock will also have to worry about their viability of their respective jobs.

 

The following, taken from today's bankruptcy press release, when translated in effect means that Mike Zafirovski and the board of directors are failures-

 

Nortel made this decision with the unanimous authorization of its Board of Directors after thorough consultation with its advisors and extensive consideration of all other alternatives. This process will allow Nortel to deal decisively with its cost and debt burden, to effectively restructure its operations and to narrow its strategic focus in an effective and timely manner.

 

The Company commenced a process to turn around and transform Nortel in late 2005, and the Company made important progress on a number of fronts. However, the global financial crisis and recession have compounded Nortel's financial challenges and directly impacted its ability to complete this transformation. Nortel is taking this action now, with a $2.4 billion(3) cash position, to preserve its liquidity and fund operations during the restructuring process.

 

"Nortel must be put on a sound financial footing once and for all," said Nortel President and CEO Mike Zafirovski. "These actions are imperative so that Nortel can build on its core strengths and become the highly focused and financially sound leader in the communications industry that its people, technology and customer relationships show it ought to be. I am confident that the actions we're announcing today will be the fastest, most effective means to translate our improved operational efficiency, double-digit productivity, focused R&D and technology leadership into long-term success. I want to reaffirm Nortel's dedication to delivering world-class solutions and services to customers."

 



Jan 14, 2009 9:28 AM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

"NORTEL'S FALL FROM GRACE"

 

FROM THE STAR.COM-

 

 

Nortel's fall from grace

January 14, 2009

DAVID OLIVE TORONTO STAR

Finally, some good news for Nortel Networks Corp., if not its long-suffering employees and investors.

 

The decision of Canada's R&D flagship company to seek court-supervised creditor protection in Canada and the U.S. makes official that Nortel's eight-year struggle to recover from its implosion early this decade is over.

 

No more repeated rounds of layoffs – 16 in the past decade, chopping Nortel's workforce to a current 26,000 from 95,000 in 2000. No more fuzzy accounting. No more CEO fraud charges. No more class-action lawsuits from irate investors. No more high-profile failures to find buyers for assets in order to rustle up cash. No more polite threats from the New York Stock Exchange that Nortel will soon be delisted for trading below $1 (U.S.).

 

It's finally over.

 

Three CEOs during the past eight years, including a bona fide turnaround artist with telecom smarts in current CEO Mike Zafirovski, simply couldn't fix what once was Canada's most valuable company, worth $366 billion (U.S.) in 2000 and a negligible $192 million (U.S.) today.

 

Nortel shares that topped out at $1,231 (U.S.) – or $124.50 (U.S.), not accounting for a subsequent share consolidation – fell more than 20 per cent Tuesday, to 38.5 cents (U.S.). Even that will likely be wiped out in a bankruptcy protection reorganization, the fate of Air Canada common shareholders when the airline filed for creditor protection in 2003.

 

But also like Air Canada, Nortel, in whole or in parts, will emerge stronger than today's current shadow of a firm whose value once accounted for two-thirds of the Toronto Stock Exchange.

 

Given the layoffs, the always mysterious accounting methodology, and the uncertain status of divisions sporadically rumoured to be on the auction block, Nortel long ago ceased to be a place where the best and brightest telecommunications scientists sought to work. For those who've remained, the Nortel corporate culture has been one of survivor guilt.

 

Enough. How much humbling can one firm take?

 

Even back-to-the-wall General Motors Corp., in decline since the early 1980s, managed to turn the occasional lusty profit as recently as this decade. There are accounting mavens in Toronto who will explain to you that Nortel has not turned an actual, as opposed to reported, profit in any year since the late 1990s. In its fiscal quarter ended last Aug. 30, Nortel managed to spill $3.4 billion (U.S.) in red ink – which is pretty appalling in the seventh year of a supposed turnaround.

 

Nortel's epic fall from grace is almost too long ago to recall its origins. Suffice to say that like most of the world's largest makers of telecom equipment, it vastly and rapidly over-expanded in the late 1990s as the Internet went mainstream.

 

Suddenly Nortel had urgent orders for massive amounts of equipment from its traditional Baby Bell customers, and also from scores of start-up phone companies and Internet service providers seeking to carve out a niche from "incumbent" carriers like Illinois Bell and Pacific Bell. For the only time in its century-old history, the staid business of supplying telecom gear was sexy.

 

Then, abruptly, the music stopped. First the upstarts telcos ran out of money, often before generating their first dollar of revenue. And in the post 9/11 U.S. recession, the deeper-pocketed incumbents began cancelling orders too.

 

Meanwhile, Nortel had spent some $34 billion (U.S.) snapping up specialist telecom equipment makers, most of which were duds and had to be written off. There wasn't a lot of time for due diligence when the pool of available computer-engineering talent was limited, and the fear was of losing orders from panic buyers to rivals more resembling a one-stop shop than you.

 

If it's any solace for those Nortel employees and shareholders who've remained loyal to the firm, hoping for a comeback of the 113-year-old company, the fate of rivals Alcatel S.A., Lucent Technologies Inc. and Motorola Inc. has been scarcely better. The merged Alcatel-Lucent S.A., based in France, lost E$3.9 billion over the past four quarters. Chicago-based Motorola Inc., from which Zafirovski hailed, lost $487 million (U.S.) over the same period.

 

Only Cisco Systems Inc.. a relative youngster based in San Jose, Calif., and briefly the most valuable company in the world with a market cap of $555 billion (U.S.) in 2000, managed to survive the sharp downturn in good health. Dismissed by Nortel as a single-suited maker of routers, which act as traffic cops for Internet signals, Cisco now boasts a diminished but still prodigious market cap of $96.3 billion (U.S.). With its most recent annual profit of $8.1 billion (U.S.), Cisco could buy all of its weak competitors with just one quarter's worth of earnings.

 

In its illustrious history prior to the mania of the late 1990s, Nortel made telephones and telephone-switching gear, of course, but also radios, walkie-talkies, traffic lights and even a Manhattan TV studio for one of the big three U.S. networks. More important, Nortel was a pioneer in satellite technology and fibre optics, the glass "pipes" through which Internet signals travel.

 

But after way too much of a good thing, in way too compressed a time, Nortel was obliged early this decade to shed most of its workforce, close dozens of factories and R&D centres worldwide, and decide which of its divisions to back and which to sell, making too little progress on the last front.

 

In the relative serenity of creditor protection, Nortel will make still deeper cuts in its cost structure and find foreign buyers for its major divisions. As standalone businesses freed from Nortel's endless accounting and reorganization struggles, the firm's Ethernet, carrier networks gear and enterprise division, which sells telecom equipment to businesses, will be ably focused on the basics of new-product development and maintaining clients' equipment. In recent years, Nortel's client base shrank as its ability to cope with such basics was increasingly in doubt.

 

The 20 per cent-plus drop in Nortel stock Tuesday was driven by fears Nortel couldn't make a $107-million (U.S.) interest payment on bonds that was due tomorrow.

 

One hundred and seven million dollars, a mere rounding error in the glory days.

 

At the height of the global telecom exuberance in 2000, then-CEO John Roth paid $3.2 billion (U.S.) in Nortel's high-flying stock for a three-year-old outfit named Xros Corp., based in Sunnyvale, Calif. For their promising work with tiny silicon mirrors intended to supercharge the speed of Internet light beams, Nortel lavished the equivalent of $36 million on each of Xros's 90 employees.

 

By any standard of mergers and acquisitions valuation, the price was ludicrous. "But look at it this way," Roth told me then. "I gave up 1.7 per cent of Nortel stock to get Xros. And the next day, Nortel stock went up 5 per cent, because the market thought Xros added great value to us. That's the new math."

 

The new new math is that Nortel can't make good on a $107-million debt obligation. And that was enough to kill the company.

 

And Xros? A total writeoff.

 

 

 



Jan 14, 2009 10:42 AM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

Joel Hackney's comments demonstrate a high level of arrogance, and his statements represent insults to shareholders and employees alike-

 

Bankruptcy filing was in part to preserve $2.4B in cash, Nortel exec says

Hackney says cash to be used to deliver products, support to customers

Matt Hamblen

 

January 14, 2009 (Computerworld) One major reason why Nortel Networks Corp. filed for protection from its creditors in the U.S. and other countries today was to preserve $2.4 billion in cash, which the company plans to use to provide support and service its customers, Nortel's head of enterprise sales said today.

 

"The $2.4 billion in cash we have is an important number to understand," said Joel Hackney, president of enterprise solutions at Nortel, in a telephone interview. "That money allows us to deliver products we have committed to customers and allows product support for customers."

 

Hackney said he was referring to switches and other networking gear that customer have agreed to purchase but that Nortel has not yet delivered. Some of the equipment might not be completely built or provisioned, and some might be waiting to be delivered at some cost.

 

Product support is an enormous ongoing cost for equipment suppliers and usually involves phone and e-mail contact with Nortel's support staff or its contractors in the event of problems.

 

Hackney said that as soon as the news was announced today, he began calling the CIOs at Nortel's five largest customers. "They had known about the $4 billion in Nortel debts for a while," he said. "They are savvy, and they get it and said they understand that Nortel is taking decisive actions to ensure it has support and R&D."

 

Hackney said that some Nortel employees and others might have been shocked by today's news.

 

"We regret the impact this could have for some of our stakeholders, and we know this is disturbing for employees to go through an unknown process, that's clear enough," he said. "Once we work through the emotion, though, we know this is the right decision ... for long term success."

 

Hackney said that while some analysts might suggest that Nortel customers in line for an equipment refresh consider alternative providers, he said those customers need to look at why they have always chosen Nortel.

 

"I'd tell a customer considering a refresh to assess whether Nortel gives you the best value for the progress of your business, does it interoperate with other equipment and give the return on investment," Hackney said. "Those are the same questions as always. I'm absolutely convinced that our value proposition is there as before and only gets stronger with financial protections."

 



Jan 14, 2009 4:05 PM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

Employees and shareholders of Nortel, everything centers around Mike Z. reputation and legacy, it is Mike Z. future prospects that are the center of attention-FROM BLOOMBERG news:

 

Zafirovski Future May Hang on Motorola Instead of Nortel Botch

Email | Print | A A A

 

By Vivek Shankar

 

Jan. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Nortel Networks Corp. Chief Executive Officer Mike Zafirovski may be able to save himself even if he can’t save his bankrupt company.

 

Nortel, North America’s biggest maker of phone gear, filed for protection yesterday in North American courts after falling behind on technology and succumbing to the recession. Nortel has lost almost $7 billion since Zafirovski took the reins in 2005, after being passed over for the top job at Motorola Inc.

 

The bankruptcy may lead to the destruction of the century- old company, since none of its businesses are growing, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co. analyst Ehud Gelblum. If Zafirovski were to seek a new job, employers might focus more on his success at Motorola’s mobile-phone unit than on Nortel, said Bob Concannon, top technology recruiter at executive-search firm Boyden.

 

“The market might give him a Mulligan on this one,” Concannon said. “He’s got great scar tissue and a good set of eyeballs. He’s got another gig left for a large company.”

 

Zafirovski, 53, wasn’t available to comment, Nortel spokesman Jay Barta said. The company plans to keep operating through the restructuring. Zafirovski is committed to leading Nortel through the slump and has the support of the board, Barta said.

 

Others say he may not relish another turnaround effort. Zafirovski, a former General Electric Co. executive, came to Nortel with a mandate of cleaning up a $3.2 billion accounting fraud and winning back customers. At the time, he said it would take three to five years to turn the company around.

 

Stay for Cleanup

 

“We will see whether he is kept on to work on the cleanup or like in most restructurings, he exits pretty quickly,” said Paul Hand, managing director of equity trading at RBC Capital Markets in Toronto.

 

Increased competition from Cisco Systems Inc. and a failure to shift fast enough to new technology from the old code division multiple access standard slowed Zafirovski’s plans. The executive cut about 6,000 jobs, sold off a high-speed mobile unit to work on faster technologies such as WiMax and Long-Term Evolution. So far those ideas haven’t borne fruit, as carriers such as Verizon Wireless and AT&T Inc. predict that the standard won’t be widely used until at least 2010.

 

“I don’t think it’s an easy industry to navigate through with competition and with the bets that you’re placing on new technologies,” said John Moore, a KDP analyst in Montpelier, Vermont. “I don’t necessarily fault management.”

 

Zafirovski, who spent 25 years at GE, joined Motorola in June 2000 as president of the company’s mobile-phone business, its largest unit. He was promoted to president and chief operating officer at the Schaumburg, Illinois-based company in July 2002 after he helped reverse market share losses and gain ground on Nokia Oyj.

 

Leaving Motorola

 

He left after Motorola chose Ed Zander, a former executive at Sun Microsystems Inc., to lead the company. Zander himself left the phone maker after failing to build on the success of the best-selling Razr device.

 

Yesterday, Motorola announced plans to cut 4,000 jobs, joining AT&T Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc. in trimming payrolls to shield themselves from the global slump. Money markets in the U.S. seized up following the Sept. 15 failure of the securities firm Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

 

Nortel also blamed the recession for its foray into bankruptcy. Another part of Zafirovski’s problem was that the talent pool at Nortel wasn’t deep enough as at Motorola, Concannon said.

 

On Zafirovski’s watch, Nortel hired Chief Financial Officer Pavi Binning, a former Hanson Plc executive; Chief Technology Officer John Roese, who previously served at Broadcom Corp.; and GE’s Joel Hackney, hired as the president of Nortel’s enterprise unit. Roese has since left, a victim of Zafirovski’s latest round of job cuts.

 

Zafirovski’s work at Nortel also suffered from a lack of focus, said JPMorgan’s Gelblum. He should have split up the company earlier and concentrated on one part of the business, perhaps the wireless unit, he said. Instead, Zafirovski tried to run a company with a smorgasbord of offerings.

 

“He tried to treat it like John Chambers treats Cisco, which is the CEO being way up top, having division leaders and presidents running the businesses,” Gelblum said. “He didn’t have the talent for those businesses to run themselves. He needed to be at every sales pitch, but he couldn’t do it all.”

 

To contact the reporter on this story: Vivek Shankar in San Francisco at vshankar3@bloomberg.net

 

Last Updated: January 15, 2009 00:01 EST

 



Jan 15, 2009 8:45 AM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

No current Nortel employee should feel safe or secure! From CNN-

 

UPDATE: Nortel Rivals May Gain As Customers Seek Stable Cos

 

January 14, 2009: 03:02 PM ET

 

 

(Updates with ShoreTel CEO comments, share prices)

 

By Kejal Vyas

 

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

 

NEW YORK -(Dow Jones)- Nortel Networks Corp.'s (NT) filing for bankruptcy protection could help competing network-equipment providers gain new customers, but it also could hurt Nortel suppliers like Flextronics International Ltd. ( FLEX) and Polycom Inc. (PLCM).

 

Although it's early to say, competing network-equipment providers, most notably Motorola Inc. (MOT) and ShoreTel Inc. (SHOR), could benefit as some of Nortel's customers will likely look for more stable suppliers, analysts say.

 

Earlier Wednesday, citing a need to put itself "on a sound financial footing once and for all," Nortel said it is seeking creditor protection in Canada while some of its U.S. subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

 

The struggling Toronto-based company said the global financial crisis and recession have severely hit its efforts to turn itself around, which have been going on since 2005.

 

Among larger telecommunications players that could gain, Motorola's mobile- networking-equipment unit held up rather well in 2008 compared with other parts of the company, said Todd Rosenbluth, a telecommunications analyst at Standard & Poor's Equity Research.

 

With that in mind, "we contend telecom carriers will shift spending to suppliers with relatively stable operations like Motorola" as contracts come up for renewal in the weak economy, Rosenbluth said.

 

A Motorola spokesperson declined to comment.

 

In the small-cap telecom arena, Wedbush Morgan said ShoreTel, a provider of Internet telephony hardware and software, could seize market shares if Nortel is unable to hold on to its position as the third-largest enterprise voice- equipment maker.

 

Nortel's announcement is a reminder of the difficulties that lie ahead for traditionally top-tier telecom names, said ShoreTel Chief Executive John W. Combs, calling it "a milestone." A shift toward newer technologies has hit telecom giants, with many now having to spend money to keep up, Combs said, adding that his company is strategically positioned to gain.

 

While both companies may stand to gain, their shares fell Wednesday on a weak day for the overall market. Motorola slipped 3.7% to 4.16, while ShoreTel lost 6.4% to 4.10.

 

"There is still some near-term uncertainty," said Gartner analyst Mark Fabbi, as investors wait to see what Nortel's fate is and how its hopes to sell off some assets pan out.

 

And before some of the smaller players step up, Fabbi said, larger dominant companies will be able to hold on to their share first, highlighting Cisco Systems Inc.'s (CSCO) top position in the enterprise voice-equipment market.

 

A Cisco spokesperson wasn't immediately available to comment. Shares of the company edged down 3.7% to 15.83.

 

On the flip side, suppliers to Nortel will likely take a knock. Shares of Flextronics shed 11% to 2.66 as the electronics-manufacturing-services company disclosed that Nortel was a major customer. In a release, Flextronics said it had been working to reduce its exposure to Nortel for "several months."

 

Elsewhere, the news could hurt Polycom, which was a "strategic global partner" with Nortel, Wedbush said. Still, the damage is expected to be marginal because Polycom already has similar partnerships with other industry leaders like Cisco and Avaya Inc. (AV).

 

A Polycom spokesperson wasn't immediately available to comment. Polycom's stock dropped 3.5% to 13.93 a share.

 

-By Kejal Vyas, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5460, kejal.vyas@dowjones.com

 

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

01-14-09 1502ET

Copyright (c) 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

 



Jan 15, 2009 8:49 AM by Larry


Click to view Larry's profile
     

Yep! More Nortel layoffs should be expected, from gigaom.com-

 

Updated: Nortel Is Bankrupt, More Layoffs Coming

Stacey Higginbotham | Wednesday, January 14, 2009 | 5:58 AM PT | 9 comments

Updated with confirmation, comment from Nortel: In a sign of just how deep the troubles of the troubled telecommunications industry currently run, The Globe and Mail is reporting — and Nortel Networks has now confirmed — that the equipment maker plans to file for bankruptcy, perhaps as soon as today. The Canadian company has $4.5 billion in debt, and faces declining sales for its gear as operators pause network deployments. To further its woes, Nortel is having a tough time selling off its metro Ethernet division, a move aimed at raising more cash.

 

Nortel could not be reached for comment, but Bankruptcy rumors have dogged the company in the last few weeks. Tomorrow it has to make a $107 million interest payment on its debt — something that analysts know it can do now, but are worried about down the road. It’s odd that a company with cash on hand would file for bankruptcy, but Nortel could already have expressions of interest from potential buyers who could buy the company without its debt burden after a trip through the bankruptcy courts. A company spokesperson, via email, said simply that, “After full consideration of all other alternatives, and in light of the current adverse economic environment, Nortel concluded this step is in the best long-term interests of Nortel and its stakeholders.”

 

The Globe and Mail proposes a bleaker scenario, speculating the Nortel may choose bankruptcy now because it’s concerned about its ability to raise financing to get it through the bankruptcy process if it waits until its coffers run dry. In that case, an earlier bankruptcy could make Nortel a better target for a buyer interested in keeping employees and healthy product lines.

 

“Nortel must be put on a sound financial footing once and for all,” said Nortel President and CEO Mike Zafirovski said in the press release announcing the move. Of course, Nortel has been trying to turn around since the telecom bubble burst:

 

The Company commenced a process to turn around and transform Nortel in late 2005, and the Company made important progress on a number of fronts. However, the global financial crisis and recession have compounded Nortel’s financial challenges and directly impacted its ability to complete this transformation. Nortel is taking this action now, with a $2.4 billion cash position, to preserve its liquidity and fund operations during the restructuring process.

 

As far as its employees go, the Nortel spokesperson said the company wasn’t making any related layoff announcements. “However, our costs still need to come down. As part of our comprehensive restructuring, we do expect that there will be further layoffs.”

 

 

 



Jan 15, 2009 3:24 PM by Larry


Leave a Comment

Log In to have full access and participate in our Nortel Community. Register now if you don't have an account


Actions
  Recent Comments